| Should Prostitution be LEGAL? (sensitive material, be warned) | |
|
+26vh_stateofcalamity socialwimpy l0r3nz0m1r4nd4 termulator dhira2dharma pierminator Dirty Shoes Records puzzledpanther m(A)rcor(E) selo is the name killing christians today xtreblinkalovescenex rupert NIGGATRON tadsz killarvz KINGKONG ARMAGEDDON miyong Jepoyic Jepp! tat's boy vishualaide oldskulmamah mr. swansong jep_peligro yokiisthename 30 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
NIGGATRON
| Subject: Re: Should Prostitution be LEGAL? (sensitive material, be warned) Fri May 15, 2009 12:55 pm | |
| TOP O' THA MORNING TO YA BOSSLADY!!!... ON BEHALF OF THE TWO HALF-BREED DOORKNOBS HERE WHO BLATANTLY HIJACKED THIS WONDERFUL THREAD, PLEASE ACCEPT MY SINCEREST APOLOGIES. REST ASSURED THAT THESE ASKALS NOW HAVE BEEN KEPT ON A SHORT LEASH... PLEASE PARDON THE PUN. | |
|
| |
NIGGATRON
| Subject: Re: Should Prostitution be LEGAL? (sensitive material, be warned) Fri May 15, 2009 12:58 pm | |
| - xxxImjustagirlxxx wrote:
- you dont know the meaning of d word respect.. do you??
RESPECT IS EARNED YOUNG LADY. IT'S SOMETHING YOU DONT GET OFF THE BAT. GOOD MORNING TO YOU TOO. | |
|
| |
xxxImjustagirlxxx
| Subject: Re: Should Prostitution be LEGAL? (sensitive material, be warned) Fri May 15, 2009 1:32 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
tat's boy
| Subject: Re: Should Prostitution be LEGAL? (sensitive material, be warned) Fri May 15, 2009 2:45 pm | |
| - xxxImjustagirlxxx wrote:
- DA.GENIUS.FRMRLY.KNOWN.AS wrote:
- I NEED AT LEAST 10 VALID AND EXCELLENT POINTS/REASONS TO GO BACK TO THAT SHITHOLE.
SO FAR I ONLY GOT 5 1/2:
-PINAY PEKPEK -----MORE PINAY PEKPEK (KAKASAWA RIN MINSAN IBANG LAHI EH)
tsk.. bad capslock bad!! how dare you?! shithole ka jan... you dont know the meaning of d word respect.. do you??
too bad for you... ibig nyang sabihin nakakasawa daw yong talong, aso, baboy sa amerika hehehe LOL KA CAPSLOCK!!! HEHEHEHE wag kana bumalik dito walang papatol sayo kahit bakla, tsaka hindi na dito uso yong maliit yong titi hehehehe jan ka nalang LOL ka!!! | |
|
| |
selo is the name
| Subject: Re: Should Prostitution be LEGAL? (sensitive material, be warned) Fri May 15, 2009 6:47 pm | |
| - DA.GENIUS.FRMRLY.KNOWN.AS wrote:
- TOP O' THA MORNING TO YA BOSSLADY!!!... ON BEHALF OF THE TWO HALF-BREED DOORKNOBS HERE WHO BLATANTLY HIJACKED THIS WONDERFUL THREAD, PLEASE ACCEPT MY SINCEREST APOLOGIES. REST ASSURED THAT THESE ASKALS NOW HAVE BEEN KEPT ON A SHORT LEASH... PLEASE PARDON THE PUN.
feeling... | |
|
| |
mr. swansong hoodlum
| Subject: Re: Should Prostitution be LEGAL? (sensitive material, be warned) Fri May 15, 2009 8:53 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
vh_stateofcalamity
| Subject: Re: Should Prostitution be LEGAL? (sensitive material, be warned) Fri May 15, 2009 11:02 pm | |
| - DA.GENIUS.FRMRLY.KNOWN.AS wrote:
- I NEED AT LEAST 10 VALID AND EXCELLENT POINTS/REASONS TO GO BACK TO THAT SHITHOLE.
SO FAR I ONLY GOT 5 1/2:
-PINAY PEKPEK -----MORE PINAY PEKPEK (KAKASAWA RIN MINSAN IBANG LAHI EH)
talaga? cge nga anong feeling ng kumakantot? pay to play ba yang datingan mo? kaya pala pabor ka sa prostitution.. now i understand.. | |
|
| |
raymond667
| Subject: Re: Should Prostitution be LEGAL? (sensitive material, be warned) Sat May 16, 2009 8:31 am | |
| | |
|
| |
raymond667
| Subject: Re: Should Prostitution be LEGAL? (sensitive material, be warned) Sat May 16, 2009 8:58 am | |
| back to the topic:
anu ba pagkakaiba ng trabahong legal sa hindi legal? lahat tayo ay prostitue sa ating mga boss, hehehehe | |
|
| |
mr. swansong hoodlum
| Subject: Re: Should Prostitution be LEGAL? (sensitive material, be warned) Sat May 16, 2009 3:02 pm | |
| ^^^ haha! peace na tayo lahat ah.. nakalimutan ko.. belated sir selo... andoks is da best pulutan!! hihi!!! | |
|
| |
xxxImjustagirlxxx
| Subject: Re: Should Prostitution be LEGAL? (sensitive material, be warned) Sat May 16, 2009 3:10 pm | |
| - raymond667 wrote:
- back to the topic:
lahat tayo ay prostitue sa ating mga boss, hehehehe Prostitute: 1. One who solicits and accepts payment for sex acts. 2. One who sells one's abilities, talent, or name for an unworthy purpose. heeeh... (super search sa google) | |
|
| |
raymond667
| Subject: Re: Should Prostitution be LEGAL? (sensitive material, be warned) Sat May 16, 2009 4:06 pm | |
| - xxxImjustagirlxxx wrote:
- raymond667 wrote:
- back to the topic:
lahat tayo ay prostitue sa ating mga boss, hehehehe Prostitute:
1. One who solicits and accepts payment for sex acts. 2. One who sells one's abilities, talent, or name for an unworthy purpose. heeeh... (super search sa google) korek, mas ok pa nag ung mga sex worker kasi ala silang boss! at ung iba naman eh nag eenjoy sila sa ginagawa nila!! trhough ung iba eh napipilitan lang. anu ba pagkakaiba ng sex worker (prostitute) sa porn star, sa office boy at sa gay stripper? | |
|
| |
raymond667
| Subject: Re: Should Prostitution be LEGAL? (sensitive material, be warned) Sat May 16, 2009 4:10 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
selo is the name
| Subject: Re: Should Prostitution be LEGAL? (sensitive material, be warned) Sun May 17, 2009 9:32 am | |
| | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Should Prostitution be LEGAL? (sensitive material, be warned) | |
| |
|
| |
| Should Prostitution be LEGAL? (sensitive material, be warned) | |
|